KES,
BEM DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Beart eGR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON VA 22204 -2490
BAN
Docket No: NRO¢106-14
i5 September 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 10 September 2014. your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings ef this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
The Board also notes that you have applied for a correction to
your record for an error that allegedly occurred more than 55
years ago. Under the rules governing this Board, an application
for a correction of a naval record must be made within three
years after the discovery of the alleged error. Failure to file
within the prescribed three years may be excused only in cases
where the Board finds that it is in the interests of justice to
do so.
Because you neglected to assert your claim for an inordinately
long period of time without sufficient justification and you
provided no evidence as to why you did not seek to have the
alleged error corrected earlier, the Board decided to deny your
case based on the statute. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when appiyin
naval record, the burden i
existence of probable mater
Docket No.NRO9106-14
m ot an otiicias
g fora correctlo
s on the applican
jal error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Shap a YL 0
L/S
HES AF IE |Z
£
J bE: J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3828 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRO3828-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3978 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR3978-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3270 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient +o establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. for a correction of an official naval Consequently, when applying to demonstrate the existence of record, the burden is on the applicant probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3453 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 December 2014. material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board Docket No.NRO03453-14 prior to making its decision in this case, In.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3764 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this cage. Docket No.NHRO3764-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an optical naval record, the burden ig on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4443 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4396 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6538 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3410 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2014 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your n aval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies . Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the app licant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR240 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...